American International Journal of Research and Innovation
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJRI
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Responsible Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services
| Author(s) | Dr. Sarah M. Thompson |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in public services to support eligibility determination, risk assessment, resource allocation, fraud detection, healthcare administration, education planning, taxation, policing, and citizen-service delivery. Although algorithmic systems may improve consistency and administrative efficiency, their use creates substantial concerns regarding discrimination, opacity, privacy, procedural fairness, and institutional responsibility. These concerns are particularly important in the public sector because algorithm-supported decisions can affect access to essential services, legal rights, public benefits, and individual opportunities. This study examines the relationship between responsible artificial intelligence and algorithmic accountability in public-service environments. It develops an integrated accountability framework based on legality, transparency, explainability, human oversight, contestability, auditability, data governance, and institutional responsibility. Because no verified public-sector dataset was supplied, the analytical component employs an explicitly simulated assessment of four governance models: no formal governance, basic compliance controls, standardized human review, and an integrated accountability framework. The simulated analysis evaluates transparency, fairness safeguards, human oversight, auditability, and citizen redress. The integrated framework achieves the highest illustrative accountability index of 91.4, compared with 56.8 for the absence of formal governance. These values are methodological illustrations rather than empirical findings. The study concludes that public-sector AI cannot be considered responsible merely because it is technically accurate. Legitimate implementation requires clear public authority, proportionate risk assessment, traceable decisions, meaningful human intervention, independent evaluation, and accessible mechanisms through which affected individuals can obtain explanations and challenge adverse outcomes. |
| Keywords | responsible artificial intelligence, algorithmic accountability, public services, digital governance, administrative fairness, human oversight, algorithmic transparency. |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 2019 |
| Published On | 2019-02-26 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AIJRI is 10.00000/AIJRI
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.