American International Journal of Research and Innovation
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJRI
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Deep Learning Approaches for Automated Medical Image Classification
| Author(s) | Dr. Claire Martin |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Medical imaging plays a central role in screening, diagnosis, treatment planning, disease monitoring, and clinical decision-making. The growing volume and complexity of radiological, pathological, ophthalmological, and dermatological images have increased interest in automated classification systems capable of assisting medical professionals. Deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks, can extract hierarchical image features directly from pixels and has demonstrated considerable potential across chest radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, mammography, histopathology, retinal imaging, and dermoscopy. Despite this potential, clinical adoption remains constrained by limited annotated datasets, class imbalance, institutional variability, model opacity, shortcut learning, privacy concerns, and inadequate external validation. This study proposes and evaluates a simulation-based framework for automated medical image classification. Four architectures—a conventional convolutional neural network, VGG16 transfer-learning model, ResNet50, and DenseNet121—are compared using a synthetic benchmark of 6,000 labeled medical-image representations distributed across four diagnostic classes. The evaluation incorporates balanced data partitioning, augmentation, class-weighted learning, stratified cross-validation, calibration assessment, and simulated domain-shift testing. No real patients, hospitals, medical images, or protected health information were used. The simulated results show that DenseNet121 provides the strongest overall performance, achieving 92.8% accuracy, 92.1% sensitivity, 93.4% specificity, an F1 score of 92.4%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.966. ResNet50 records comparable performance with slightly lower computational efficiency. The conventional convolutional network remains less accurate but offers greater architectural simplicity. The study concludes that automated medical image classification should be evaluated through clinically meaningful metrics, independent testing, uncertainty assessment, explainability, subgroup analysis, and qualified professional oversight. Simulated performance must not be interpreted as evidence of clinical safety or diagnostic effectiveness. |
| Keywords | : deep learning, medical image classification, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, diagnostic imaging, DenseNet, ResNet, clinical artificial intelligence. |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 2019 |
| Published On | 2019-02-21 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AIJRI is 10.00000/AIJRI
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.